[[["容易理解","easyToUnderstand","thumb-up"],["確實解決了我的問題","solvedMyProblem","thumb-up"],["其他","otherUp","thumb-up"]],[["缺少我需要的資訊","missingTheInformationINeed","thumb-down"],["過於複雜/步驟過多","tooComplicatedTooManySteps","thumb-down"],["過時","outOfDate","thumb-down"],["翻譯問題","translationIssue","thumb-down"],["示例/程式碼問題","samplesCodeIssue","thumb-down"],["其他","otherDown","thumb-down"]],["上次更新時間:2025-03-30 (世界標準時間)。"],[[["Dynamic rendering was a temporary solution for search engines having trouble accessing JavaScript-generated content, and it is not recommended for long-term use."],["Websites may utilize dynamic rendering to present a server-rendered version of their content to search engine bots while displaying the client-side rendered version to users."],["Modern solutions like server-side rendering, static rendering, or hydration are preferred over dynamic rendering."],["Dynamic rendering is not considered cloaking by Google as long as the content served to bots is similar to that presented to users."],["Websites with rapidly changing JavaScript-generated content or using JavaScript features unsupported by crawlers might have previously used dynamic rendering as a workaround."]]],["Dynamic rendering serves search engine crawlers a server-rendered version of content, while users see client-side rendered content, as a workaround for JavaScript limitations. It detects crawler requests and routes them to a rendering server for static HTML delivery. While not considered cloaking if content is similar, serving entirely different content is. This method is complex and not recommended long-term; server-side, static rendering, or hydration are preferred alternatives. Dynamic rendering was used for public, rapidly changing or incompatible Javascript content.\n"]]